Alexandria Library

A curated collection of awesome articles

Here are some ressources related to Research, Journals, Replication. Hoping you will find learning material, alternative tools or just some interesting stuff.

Home > Education, Technology, Entrepreneur... > Education, Economics, Research, Psy... > Psychology, Sociology, Decision-mak... > Research, Journals, Replication

Articles

A once respected biology journal indicts evolutionary biology for ableism
See discussion (89 comments, 83 points) - Archive
What's wrong with social science and how to fix it (2020)
See discussion (142 comments, 138 points) - Archive
Surely you're publishing, Mr. Feynman
See discussion (104 comments, 209 points) - Archive
An Existential Threat to Doing Good Science
See discussion (95 comments, 97 points) - Archive
The 'attention economy' corrupts science
See discussion (167 comments, 323 points) - Archive
We don't know how to fix science (2021)
See discussion (143 comments, 106 points) - Archive
Scientific integrity in a climate of perverse incentives and competition (2017)
See discussion (18 comments, 100 points) - Archive
How trust undermines science
See discussion (110 comments, 83 points) - Archive
Avoid Meaningless Binary Labels
See discussion (57 comments, 98 points) - Archive
E.O. Wilson saw the world in a new way
See discussion (22 comments, 97 points) - Archive
A Meta-Scientific Perspective on Thinking: Fast and Slow (2020)
See discussion (39 comments, 130 points) - Archive
If you think psychological science is bad, imagine how bad it was in 1999
See discussion (228 comments, 275 points) - Archive
I won’t review or write for Elsevier and other commercial scientific journals
See discussion (24 comments, 109 points) - Archive
Another scam paper published in a “scientific” journal
See discussion (46 comments, 84 points) - Archive
E.O. Wilson on Becoming a Great Scientist
See discussion (27 comments, 89 points) - Archive
Peer-reviewed papers are getting increasingly boring
See discussion (204 comments, 364 points) - Archive
Measuring "efficiency" in document prepration: Microsoft Word vs. LaTex
See discussion (157 comments, 89 points) - Archive
Laypeople can predict which social-science studies will replicate successfully
See discussion (69 comments, 150 points) - Archive
What's wrong with social science and how to fix it
See discussion (101 comments, 142 points) - Archive
New academic journal only publishes 'unsurprising' research rejected by others
See discussion (202 comments, 884 points) - Archive
Reckoning with Our Mistakes
See discussion (41 comments, 85 points) - Archive
The Meddling Middlemen of Academia
See discussion (58 comments, 89 points) - Archive
The machine learning community has a toxicity problem
See discussion (187 comments, 143 points) - Archive
Why We Sleep: A Tale of Institutional Failure
See discussion (52 comments, 139 points) - Archive
Type I and Type II Errors: The Inevitable Errors in Optimization Experiments
See discussion (35 comments, 99 points) - Archive
What to do when you don’t trust your data anymore
See discussion (20 comments, 89 points) - Archive
Why scientists need to be better at data visualization
See discussion (76 comments, 199 points) - Archive
How Life Sciences Actually Work
See discussion (18 comments, 88 points) - Archive
Cross-national CCTV footage shows intervention is the norm in public conflicts
See discussion (35 comments, 90 points) - Archive
Let’s Publish Everything
See discussion (27 comments, 153 points) - Archive
Economics journal only publishes results that are no big deal
See discussion (46 comments, 258 points) - Archive
Statistics Done Wrong
See discussion (54 comments, 547 points) - Archive
Academic Grievance Studies and the Corruption of Scholarship
See discussion (105 comments, 184 points) - Archive
What an Audacious Hoax Reveals About Academia
See discussion (79 comments, 81 points) - Archive
Fund ideas, not pedigree, to find fresh insight
See discussion (43 comments, 263 points) - Archive
Academic success is either a crapshoot or a scam
See discussion (102 comments, 309 points) - Archive
A Clarification
See discussion (173 comments, 92 points) - Archive
What a debate about p-values shows about science
See discussion (89 comments, 103 points) - Archive
Daniel Kahneman “I placed too much faith in underpowered studies”
See discussion (328 comments, 819 points) - Archive
How to read and understand a scientific paper: a guide for non-scientists
See discussion (58 comments, 320 points) - Archive
Reasons blog posts can be of higher scientific quality than journal articles
See discussion (94 comments, 233 points) - Archive
Every attempt to manage academia makes it worse
See discussion (303 comments, 549 points) - Archive
A researcher's response to people pointing out 150 errors in four of his papers
See discussion (104 comments, 127 points) - Archive
The mathematics of science’s broken reward system
See discussion (78 comments, 187 points) - Archive
We have an epidemic of deeply flawed meta-analyses, says John Ioannidis
See discussion (49 comments, 106 points) - Archive
Big Problems Facing Science
See discussion (71 comments, 87 points) - Archive
What happens when you try to publish a failure to replicate in 2015/2016
See discussion (137 comments, 332 points) - Archive
Make journals report clinical trials properly
See discussion (19 comments, 109 points) - Archive
Why college students who do historical research become analytical thinkers
See discussion (28 comments, 92 points) - Archive
How I published a fake paper, and why it is the fault of our education system
See discussion (90 comments, 144 points) - Archive
To an alarming degree, science is not self-correcting
See discussion (138 comments, 257 points) - Archive
Is Psychology About to Come Undone?
See discussion (132 comments, 211 points) - Archive
Taboos and Self-Censorship Among U.S. Psychology Professors
See discussion (61 comments, 94 points) - Archive