Alexandria Library

A curated collection of awesome articles

Here are some ressources related to Reproducibility, Scientific, Cancer. Hoping you will find learning material, alternative tools or just some interesting stuff.

Home > Science, Technology, Health, Explor... > Cancer, Vaccines, Medical Research,... > CRISPR, Genome, DNA, Gene Therapy, ... > Reproducibility, Scientific, Cancer...

Articles

Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter

See discussion (1333 comments, 969 points) - Archive

Nobel Prize winner Gregg Semenza retracts four papers

See discussion (55 comments, 120 points) - Archive

Dual use of artificial-intelligence-powered drug discovery

See discussion (64 comments, 155 points) - Archive

US scientist falsely accused of hiding ties to China speaks out

See discussion (85 comments, 103 points) - Archive

More than half of high-impact cancer lab studies could not be replicated

See discussion (110 comments, 194 points) - Archive

Scientific Data Repositories

See discussion (22 comments, 120 points) - Archive

The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science

See discussion (142 comments, 244 points) - Archive

What my retraction taught me

See discussion (52 comments, 128 points) - Archive

How to digitize your lab notebooks

See discussion (83 comments, 118 points) - Archive

A Code Glitch May Have Caused Errors in More Than a Hundred Published Studies

See discussion (171 comments, 361 points) - Archive

Hundreds of extreme self-citing scientists revealed in new database

See discussion (208 comments, 541 points) - Archive

Plan to replicate 50 high-impact cancer papers shrinks to just 18

See discussion (191 comments, 253 points) - Archive

How to start a lab when funds are tight

See discussion (84 comments, 138 points) - Archive

The Irreproducibility Crisis of Modern Science

See discussion (251 comments, 270 points) - Archive

Redefine statistical significance

See discussion (114 comments, 303 points) - Archive

No publication without confirmation

See discussion (111 comments, 225 points) - Archive

Most scientists 'can't replicate studies by their peers'

See discussion (346 comments, 535 points) - Archive

Gates Foundation research can’t be published in top journals

See discussion (96 comments, 302 points) - Archive

Amgen publishes failures to replicate high-profile science

See discussion (14 comments, 193 points) - Archive

Cancer reproducibility effort faces backlash

See discussion (115 comments, 156 points) - Archive

Still no stem cells via easy 'STAP' path

See discussion (21 comments, 89 points) - Archive

Why I retracted my Nature paper: correcting the scientific record

See discussion (43 comments, 170 points) - Archive

Just 11% of 53 cancer research papers were reproducible

See discussion (179 comments, 292 points) - Archive

Lancet journal retracts article on hearing aids and dementia after prodding

See discussion (33 comments, 91 points) - Archive

Dana-Farberications at Harvard University

See discussion (136 comments, 221 points) - Archive

The blogger who spotted problems in Dana-Farber cancer papers

See discussion (53 comments, 147 points) - Archive

Nobel Prize winner Gregg Semenza tallies tenth retraction (2023)

See discussion (78 comments, 127 points) - Archive

Nature retracts paper that claimed adult stem cell could become any type of cell

See discussion (176 comments, 310 points) - Archive